This calculator is deliberately a HIGH estimate. It shows companies the upper end of what protection could cost — and the model still shows savings against the cost of an incident over time. Endpoint figures are based on WithSecure Elements, the endpoint stack ARA deploys and supports in the Philippines.
Figures here are illustrative planning estimates, not quotes. Engagement path: most companies start with a one-time cyber health check / architecture scoping engagement, so the design and the numbers are grounded in your actual environment. You are also free to order WithSecure Elements licences right away if you already know what you need.
Seen enough of the model?
Talk through your numbers with ARA
How to read this chart:
The Break-even point above is the first year the model shows net savings reaching $0 or higher — that number is fixed once it’s reached and isn’t affected by anything later in the chart.
For some industries and company sizes, you may notice the gap between the two lines narrow again in later years, with “Net savings” dipping back down — sometimes below zero — near the end of the 20-year view. This isn’t an error. It happens because the chance of at least one incident occurring has a natural ceiling (it can’t go past 100%), while your protection cost keeps adding up every year. So a low-risk profile can break even early, peak, and then show a later decline as cumulative spend catches up to a capped risk estimate.
The takeaway: the savings banked by your break-even year are real and don’t disappear — the later dip only reflects further hypothetical years of spend measured against a one-time risk estimate, not a loss of money you’ve already saved.
The figures above are a high planning estimate, on purpose — if the model still shows savings at this level, the real engagement usually looks better.
Next step: book a scoping conversation (Usap Tayo) for a one-time cyber health check and architecture scoping, and we will put written recommendations for you.